Align top Validators to success of $LUNC chain

I call on LUNC Community to further hold the top $LUNC validators to more accountability. A couple of these does not even truly vote for f–king sakes. If the chain does not progress, the rewards should not be paid. The community deserve refunds if you fail to do your job.

This applies to the top 33.33% of the validators, currently there are 4:

  • Progress(Weekly Price increase): no change to current rewards structure
  • Stagnant(Weekly Price is the same): 35% of their rewards to burn or back to OP
  • Failure(Weekly Price decrease): 70% of their rewards to burn or back to OP

“Weekly” timeframe and percentages are flexible for change.

This hopefully aligns majority of interests and prolong $LUNC’s life. I welcome and encourage all constructive feedback.

Thanks