I believe the first suggestion was that we open a thread where we should discuss creating a place for LUNC holders to partake in discussions and topics & make it one that belongs to the community as far as practically possible?
I am just honouring that by opening this thread, as I promised, all be it late. We can change the topic of course.
Shoot the messenger digitally by all means, but please leave the babies and unborn ones out it, even if you are super thirsty to know passport numbers and when a PFP last took a shower, just consider for my part at least that I’d meet most for a drink or coffee and show them around anyways.
Thanks guys!
I’m here. Ready for the conversation. If we want to take a more solid route than this start, we can open that.
2 Likes
What I agree with on the Space is that creating a TC whitepaper should be a priority. Currently, TC does not have a whitepaper that it can use to identify itself with. We are not even a defi protocol anymore. TC needs something that can defines it. Currently, there is no official governance which is an issue.
We also need a leadership team to guide the chain, I am not going to play word games to pacify fragile egos but essentially that is what you need if TC wants a stablecoin or if TC wants to ever relist any token with a major exchange again. I am shocked that to this day, TC is still entertaining repeg props. At this point, without the leadership team, the BC is just wasting community pool money because it will not go anywhere. If TC wants to be a legitimate player, it has to look like a legitimate player with a leadership team that is verifiable to the public, organizations and potential business partners. There is just no way around it unless TC wants to remain a joke and be in the shadows forever. AS-is is not going to work. As is is not even defi. I mean wtf? Folks think what we have now is defi?
Lets do things right. I want to help and work with establishing the right structure and to develop chain owned projects. TC needs real revenues. I would like to hear how you folks are planning to generate real revenues other than relying on the burns? I respect the burns and all the L2 projects but they do not help with meeting anything close to keep the protocol going. Look at the OP. You folks are happy with the CP? I guess when you were near 0 what we have now is like we are rich.
And yes to Margic, put together the report. I understand what you want to do and that can be a stepping stone in seeing what went wrong but, it will no solve the problem. Its gut check time, either get it right or folks will leave. I already know many good minds that left and started projects on other chains. Spell it out now, so people can plan.
I spoke to a few projects that wanted to build here. You know what they told me, they get referred to people who are supposedly reputable and then those people give them the cold shoulder. No joke, those people know who they are. These were potential partnerships. Then again, the chain’s mentality is that we cant won anything so there can be no partnerships. How messed up is that? Folks are turning away partnership because we have no leadership team. That is turning away potential revenue streams. I know of 3 instances which is SAD, AS is , the frat house mentality has to stop. We need to function as a business if TC wants to survive.
I bet the next step is to mess with the burn tax yet again to try to refill the OP. I am willing to bet a pizza on it. Because there is no other way right now.
@Margic, dont forget to log what happened to MoonRabbit and include the vision doc on what not to do. The MR Roadmap/Vision doc was self funded too. They put up harmful props that set back TC for over a year like the KYC prop just to kill the MR roadmap. Its a fact, the KYC prop’s sole purpose was to kill the MR roadmap. Add that to the report. Its LUNC history.
MR would have delivered Columbus 6, a web portal and an on chain partnership Injective like product to generate revenue.
Oh yeah, and dont forget about not getting a lawyer to intervene in the SEC and Bankruptcy court cases which cost TC good repeg capital.
These are all the consequences of not functioning as a business. We lost out on a lot of opportunities because of the gatekeeping and factionism. There needs to be change and it should start with the LUNC Whitepaper and a Leadership team.
My end is this to the folks here. If you folks are serious and want to turn LUNC around and have LUNC run like a business so we can all make money, have a shot of a new stablecoin and be respected to start on the COSMOS and maybe migrate to another chain for a fresh start then get that leadership team and get started on the Whitepaper collectively. Everything and every opportunity has to be looked at and evaluated.
BTW: good job on the 3 limits on replies. I have many ideas to share and this should shut me up. Have a good day.
I want to get back to you on this and haven’t opened the thread discussed in the spaces and I don’t think there’s been one yet. Does this reply give you more replies? Please keep going, personally I agree with a lot of this. Unfortunately, I can’t edit the first post and don’t have any access to features to the best of my knowledge.
Hope this helps give you more replies 
Hope this helps give you more replies too
Bonus, too combat limited replies
Can we build on this roadmap? Had some promise but was abandoned.
https://t.co/EcrgqjpU0I
Spaces? We have a lot to catch up on. I was drawn into some exiting but intense work following on from the spaces. I have seen various notes here and on X. There’s so much for us to talk about and personally, I’d love to cover all the points you make and discuss the points you raise and have wanted to (legals), uninterrupted and hear from you. Maybe this would be better than finding the old X posts and responding to all! haha.
I don’t find almost any topic uncomfortable to talk about by the way and probably one of the most sovereign minds in the comm.
Feel free to dm on X if you like, we can arrange. You once said it’s gut check time. Couldn’t agree more 
1 Like
