Tiered Undelegation Periods for Terra Classic

Tiered Undelegation Periods for Terra Classic

This proposal introduces fee-based tiered undelegation periods of 7 and 14 days, in addition to the existing 21-day option. The goal is to give stakers greater flexibility while accelerating the LUNC burn rate. While the current 21-day undelegation period supports long-term staking, its rigidity can limit liquidity and discourage potential participants. Shorter, fee-based options would improve the staking experience, appeal to a wider range of stakers, and create an additional mechanism to burn LUNC.

Proposed Solution: Tiered Undelegation with set Fees

To balance flexibility with network stability, we propose three undelegation options with defined durations and fees. All fees collected from the shorter undelegation options will be burned immediately, creating an ongoing supply reduction mechanism:

7-Day Fast-Undelegation:

  • Set Fee: 1% (double the current 0.5% on-chain tax), entirely burned.
  • This option offers fast access to liquidity at a transparent cost, while significantly boosting the LUNC burn rate.

14-Day Fast-Undelegation:

  • Set Fee: 0.5% (equal to the current 0.5% on-chain tax), entirely burned.
  • A middle-ground option that delivers quicker liquidity with a burn rate stakers already know.

21-Day Standard Undelegation:

  • No Fee (unchanged).
  • Remains the default choice for users who prefer longer-term staking commitments.

By introducing these tiers, stakers can opt for faster unstaking if needed, while contributing to a burn that benefits the entire community.

Benefits

  • Enhanced Liquidity & Staking Participation: Adding 7 and 14-day options provides users with greater control over their staked assets, which may attract a broader group of stakers and increase the total amount of LUNC staked.
  • Accelerated, Measurable Deflation: Fees from the new tiers will create an additional and consistent burn stream, complementing the existing tax. This new, trackable burn source directly supports the community’s goal of rapid supply reduction.
  • Governance: This proposal establishes stable and predictable parameters through the use of set durations and fees. This framework is designed to be adaptable and can be amended by the community at any time through the standard governance process.
  • Competitive Position: Offering multiple undelegation periods balances flexibility with supply reduction goals. This approach is not common across Cosmos-based blockchains and may help Terra Classic attract and retain more stakers

Security & Stability Measures

This tiered system is designed to improve user experience without compromising network security. Several measures are built in to protect the integrity and stability of Terra Classic:

  • Fee-Based Safeguards: The implementation of fees for the shorter 7-day (1%) and 14-day (0.5%) undelegation periods acts as a direct deterrent against speculative and large-scale, coordinated unstaking. The cost of a quick exit makes it less appealing for malicious or volatile actors to manipulate the system for short-term gain.
  • 21-Day Standard Maintained: The existing 21-day undelegation period remains the default, fee-free option. It serves the needs of investors and validators who prefer a long-term, fee-free staking commitment, which benefits the overall health of the network.
  • Defined and Transparent Timelines: The 7, 14, and 21-day undelegation periods provide clear, predictable timelines, ensuring transparency for all unstaking events. By excluding immediate undelegation, we prevent chaotic exits and ensure that any unstaking still involves a waiting period that can be monitored.

Community Support and Path Forward

This framework is introduced with set durations and fees to provide clarity and predictability from the start. However, we recognize that real-world conditions may require adjustments over time. The community, through governance, can fine-tune the undelegation periods or fee rates as needed based on network performance, security considerations, and user feedback. This adaptive approach ensures the system remains balanced, secure, and aligned with Terra Classic’s long-term vision for sustainability and growth.

Overall, the proposal offers the LUNC community a new burn mechanism. By adopting tiered undelegation options, we can improve staking liquidity, increase participation, and accelerate LUNC burning through a predictable, on-chain system.

This proposal is intended to gauge community interest and gather feedback on the concept. If the community supports it, BLV Labs will submit a follow-up technical proposal detailing the implementation plan, costs, and development timeline for review and approval.

By voting YES, you support giving stakers more flexibility, increasing liquidity, and accelerating LUNC burning through a new fee-based system. A NO vote means you do not agree with the proposal. Choosing ABSTAIN means you’re neutral but want your vote to count toward quorum. A NO WITH VETO means you strongly oppose the proposal and believe it could harm the network.

1 Like

if you want to accelerate the burn rate, the fee for quick withdrawal must be much higher. Ideally we would have a “sliding scale” with range from 0-21 days.

be aware that there have been multiple attempts at this idea (example: https://common.xyz/terra-luna-classic-lunc/discussion/24785-quick-unstaking-signal)

Vegas even got his version for vote, which didn’t pass because it was too complex.

Hey, thanks! Yeah, a lot of past proposals didn’t gain traction, they were seen as too complex or included instant unstaking, which was considered risky. The tiered model (7-day at 1%, 14-day at 0.5%, 21-day at 0%) keeps things straightforward, burn focused, and gives stakers clear, flexible options. It’s easy to understand, which makes it more accessible to the broader community. Yep, totally agree on the burn rate, it can always be adjusted if needed.

I appreciate the well thought of proposal however this chain is not in a state to continue burning deeper into it’s supply, #1 burns have proven to not mark a difference on price due to the fact we burn without demand and #2 we have a liquidity issue and a depleting oracle the last thing we want is to redirect any funds coming In for the chain to be burned. Burning is not the solution to our issues.

Thanks for your feedback. Just to clarify, as there appears to be confusion. This proposal does not redirect any existing funds currently used for other purposes, such as the oracle pool. Instead, it creates a new, optional revenue stream from stakers who choose to pay a fee for faster undelegation.

The only “funds coming in for the chain” that would be affected are the newly generated fees from this specific, voluntary action. If a staker chooses the 7-day or 14-day option, the associated fee is burned, if they stick with the 21-day period, nothing changes.

This approach does not alter the existing on-chain tax or reduce any other funding mechanisms. It’s a user-triggered burn tied to liquidity preference, not a systemic depletion of supply or redirection of chain income. And, by offering stakers more flexibility with their assets, the shorter undelegation periods could potentially increase overall on-chain activity and staking participation, which would be a net positive for the ecosystem

Again that fee shouldn’t be burned it should be put into valuable use that involves, Oracle and other expenses the chain carries along with it. Also shortening the amount of time for undelegations with a not a meaningful % retained is counterproductive as this will just open the door for a wider scale of undelegations In shorter period amount of time and will just provide on chain liquidity issues along its purpose as money is been thrown away by burning.

Protocols can offer liquid staking solutions as a business. This wouldn’t impact L1 at all, so no lower stability with mass unstaking risks and no added complexity.

This idea is fine if there is demand, but for builders on the chain, not for L1 :folded_hands:

Imho, similar to Whisper, if you want different unstaking lock periods, use liquid staking.